Certifying Quality
As we continue to move further down the path of healthcare reform, finding ways to focus on and measure the quality of clinicians is generating more and more discussion. An article published this week in the Columbus Dispatch highlighted the value of board certification as a proxy for quality. The article even went so far as to reference the possibility of a higher rate of pay for physicians who maintain their certification. Opponents to board certification argue that performing well on a multiple choice exam does not truly represent good clinical quality, and that the cost to the physician as well as the time lost caring for patients in this era of physician shortage is not warranted.
In a related article from NPR, the dying art of physical examination of the patient was highlighted. In a 2002 study of family physicians, less than 40% could correctly identify 12 common heart sounds.
It would seem to me that these two studies cry out for the same solution – include hands on testing as a component of demonstrated competence for physicians. Now, before I cause a revolt at the ABMS, let’s think about this for a minute. Nurses are required to continually demonstrate hands on competencies in most hospitals to continue working in individual units such as the ICU. To be certified as an open water lifeguard you must demonstrate at least 4000 hours of open water experience to even be considered. If you want to fly a multiengine commercial jet you need at least 280 hours of experience, 10 of which are under the eye of an inflight instructor while demonstrating all the requisite skills needed to fly in a myriad of different circumstances. Why then would it seem so far fetched to require the same demonstration of skill for physicians? Combine a written course to assure mastery of knowledge with a live demonstration of clinical skills relevant to each physician specialty. Putting something of this nature into practice would of course be very challenging, but if we are truly going to demonstrate quality, this may be a good place to start the conversation.
This week the newly appointed head of CMS, Dr. Donald Berwick, gave his first public speech since his appointment in July. As the speech opened, he mentioned a lot of the “what’s” of healthcare reform; costs must decrease, new ideas are needed, we must work together, change is imperative, etc He did not, however, mention much regarding “how” he intends to lead us there. Further into the speech however, Dr. Berwick may have given us a glimpse into his plan. He referred to a “three part strategy" to:
